Julien Maes vs Roman Borvanov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W W W W L W
Form
L W L L W L W L W LHead To Head: Maes 1 - 0 Borvanov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maes winning 2 and Borvanov winning 0. The last match between Maes and Borvanov was at the Mexico City Challenger, 13-04-2009, Q1 round, Hard with Julien Maes getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julien Maes | 1 |
| Roman Borvanov | 0 |
Mexico City Challenger(13-04-2009)
7
5
6
0
| Maes | Stats | Borvanov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 428 | Highest Rank | 200 |
| 44 | Age | 43 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 53% (105-93) | Career Total W/L | 56% (247-196) |
| $425 | Career Prize Money | $7,010 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Julien Maes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Roberto Marcora
Player
Julien Maes
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Roman Borvanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Roman Borvanov
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Borvanov
Player
Jose Chamba Gomez
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Souto
Player
Roman Borvanov
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
11
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(2) 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Borvanov
Player
Rodrigo Sanchez
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Roman Borvanov
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
17
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Borvanov
Player
Jose Hernandez-Fernandez
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Meister
Player
Roman Borvanov
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Salamanca
Player
Roman Borvanov
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Borvanov
Player
Duilio Beretta
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
41%
(
32 of
79)
13
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Roman Borvanov
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (105/93) | Win/Loss | 56% (247/196) |
| 52% (228/213) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (557/475) |
| 51% (2008/1965) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4905/4603) |
| 53% (52/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (166/126) |
| 44% (14/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (62/46) |
| 48% (22/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (19/22) |
| 81% (17/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 6 | Aces Total | 391 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 18 | Total Double Faults | 324 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 430.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 530.4 |
| 57% (150/262) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3435/5803) |
| 62% (93/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2347/3435) |
| 36% (40/112) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1129/2368) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (167/451) |
| 34% (84/250) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1947/5502) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (7/16) | Challenger W/L | 46% (80/93) |
| 57% (97/73) | Futures W/L | 66% (162/85) |
| 53% (104/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (242/436) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 46% (18/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (57/108) |
| 60% (29/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (79/143) |
| 89% (102/91) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (237/205) |
| 11% (102/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (237/32) |
| 15% (96/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (206/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
